Management guru ponders its weakness.

Business/management guru Tom Peters reads the ongoing series on global warming in the New Yorker and wonders:

Why is an issue that is so grave and so real so poorly understood? Why has the issue of global warming been so poorly marketed? Why is the brand called "The Global Warming Catastrophe" such a weak brand? What can—and should—be done?

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you to cover the stories that matter most. Thank you for donating.

• One Time
• Monthly

• $120
• $180
• Other
• Donate

• $10
• $15
• Other
• Donate

Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

Did this article feel meaningful?

Make others like it possible: Give now in under 45 seconds.

• One Time 💚
• Monthly

• $120
• $180 💚
• Other
• Donate

• $10
• $15 💚
• Other
• Donate

Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

Read the comments under his post. It’s a pretty revealing snapshot of current attitudes on global warming.

(On an unrelated note, what possible justification can Powers have for having his site — and presumably his "brand" — be titled "tompeters!" Did he not get the exclamation-points-are-odious memo?)

(Via Treehugger)