All right, I’ve been blogging on the fly since the SOTU speech, and in my haste I’ve gotten a couple of things slightly off. Boring corrections and updates below the fold.

First, in this post I tried to figure out how much money Bush was really promising with his "Advanced Energy Initiative." I assumed that the "22% increase" was simply an increase in the budget of the DOE’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy dept. — that would have amounted to about $264 million.

Grist State of Emergency | A limited-run newsletter from Grist, exploring the ways climate disasters are reshaping elections. Delivered every Tuesday until Election Day.

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free.

The smarter thing to do would have been to check the White House website, where they give a fairly detailed breakdown of the AEI. Turns out it adds up to about $996 million.

However, as I noted, about a third of that money goes to coal, which neither replaces oil nor qualifies as particularly "alternative." So the real number is closer to $660 million, about half of which goes into the hydrogen sinkhole.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Second, in this post I tried to calculate just what "replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025" amounts to. I wrote that oil imports amount to 60% of our total oil use, and that Persian Gulf oil amounted to 24% of that 60% — about 14.4% of our total oil consumption. Cutting that by 75% would mean reducing overall oil use by 10.5%. I was basing all that on 2004 numbers, though, and it turns out 2005 numbers (PDF) are available.

So, update: Oil imports now amount to 65% of our total oil consumption. Persian Gulf imports are now around 17% of total imports, thus now around 11% of total oil use. Cutting that by 75% would amount to reducing oil consumption by 8.25%. Over 19 years. Even less ambitious than it seemed.