Uncategorized
All Stories
-
Snippets from the news
• Crocodile attacks illegal logger. • Oakland cannot go forward with a plastic-bag ban until it reviews the environmental effect of paper bags. • Hybrids are a tough sell in […]
-
Lots of amphibians ending up as roadkill, says research
Need a new reason to hate cars? You’re in luck! Death by vehicle could be a major contributing factor in declining numbers of amphibians, according to new research published in […]
-
Snippets from the news
• Bush administration urges appeals court to dismiss the ruling that allows states to regulate vehicle greenhouse-gas emissions. • New Jersey considers building a new nuclear power plant. • Some […]
-
An open letter to the nation’s public relations professionals
Yes, I know that Tuesday is Earth Day.
-
Snippets from the news
• Kansas governor again vetoes a coal plant. • Houston and Los Angeles are the top-polluting cities in the U.S. • Time considers “how to win the war on global […]
-
Judge denies Humane Society injunction, OKs sea-lion trapping
Denying an injunction sought by the Humane Society, a federal judge has given the go-ahead to Oregon and Washington state officials to trap and kill salmon-gobbling sea lions near the […]
-
Saving ourselves means trench warfare, not waiting for breakthroughs
On online wag recently noted that at Bell Labs -- one of the most productive, innovative places the world has ever seen -- the slogan was "Never Schedule Breakthroughs." A breakthrough is just that: a radical and unpredictable reorganization of understanding. Waiting for one is like trying to solve one of those elaborate circular garden mazes by assuming a teleporter to take you straight to the center.
We might well need some breakthroughs to survive the climate crisis, and it will be nice if we get them, but I'm much more impressed by things like this, a serious incremental step, than I am by the wondertoys we're so often told to ogle. The FLOX work is a great example of the trench warfare of science and technology. It can help buy us time to radically reduce our energy demands and switch off fossil fuel use entirely -- time to aggressively apply every off-the-shelf idea and practice we have now, without hypnotizing ourselves with the need for "breakthroughs."
-
-
Snippets from the news
• United Nations urges major agricultural countries to balance feeding poor with saving the environment. • Army Corps suggests Southeast water-sharing plan that’s likely to harm threatened species. • Critics […]
-
The gasoline tax is regressive, but only for upper-income groups
After I argued against McCain's summer gas-tax freeze, I received an email, the basic thrust of which was, "but everybody knows a gasoline tax is regressive, so how can progressives endorse it?" Well, as we will see, everybody doesn't know a gasoline tax is regressive. In fact:
- The poor are more likely not to buy any gasoline (i.e., to not own a car at all),
- poor families own fewer cars (and much fewer of the fuel-inefficient SUVs and minivans), and
- the poor tend to walk and use mass transit more.
Maybe the best description [PDF] of the situation is from a Dec. 2003 study for the state of California:
