Big political players in their midst derail possible climate-change statement

Note: We ask republishing partners to include a pixel to help us measure story reach. The only information this tracker gathers is the publication domain and date, and view counts. For questions, email syndication@grist.org

HTML

PLAIN TEXT

<h1>Big political players in their midst derail possible climate-change statement</h1>
 
 "This story was originally published by <a href="https://grist.org" title="Grist">Grist</a>. Sign up for Grist's <a href="https://go.grist.org/signup/weekly/partner?utm_campaign=republish-content&utm_medium=syndication&utm_source=partner" title="Weekly newsletter">weekly newsletter here</a>."
 
 
There’s been a lot of talk lately about the burgeoning Christian <s>environmentalist</s> creation-care movement. I’m all for any and every group getting on board with saving the planet, but my sense has been that the amount of press and hype this has received from outside the movement is rather out of proportion to any organic growth from inside the movement. It would be great for environmentalists — frequently tarred (often by <a href="/article/take-it-outside-god-boy">evangelicals themselves</a>!) as communists and pagans — if they received the support of a powerful bloc located squarely at the center of the right-wing’s base. It would also be a great story. So environmentalists and the press have conspired to pump it up.
Recent events, however, have cast some doubt on the staying power of creation care. As the Washington Post <a href="https://new-grist-develop.go-vip.net/article/bullied-pulpit/">reported today</a>, a group of more than 20 evangelical leaders sent <a href="http://www.interfaithstewardship.org/pdf/NAE-appeal%20letter.pdf">a letter</a> (PDF) to the National Association of Evangelicals asking it to put an immediate kibosh on plans to take a formal position (and issue a formal press release) on the dangers of global warming. I’ve posted the entire letter below the fold.
The NAE immediately caved. Richard Cizik — who was so eloquent on the subject of climate change in his <a href="https://new-grist-develop.go-vip.net/article/cizik/index.html">interview with Grist</a> — <a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/article_detail.cfm?AID=6853">said</a>, "The NAE was never going to adopt a policy on climate change." Sure, they just sent the letter for the heck of it.
The purported rationale for the NAE abstaining on the issue is that "global warming is not a consensus issue" and "there should be room for Bible-believing evangelicals to disagree about the cause, severity and solutions to the global warming issue." As for "solutions," I seriously doubt that the NAE would have proposed anything particularly controversial. So that pretty much leaves "causes and severity," and I’m sure you’re all familiar with those arguments.
But let’s leave aside the substantive merits, since they aren’t really the point. The point, put bluntly, is this: The right-wing base still contains a large number of people who view climate change as a piece of communist propaganda, and this fact works to the immense benefit of the Republican leadership. The very reason it would have been miraculous if the 30-million-member NAE had come out against global warming is the reason it was always unlikely to happen.
The list of signatories reveals far more about the letter than the text itself. These guys — Dobson, Colson, Wildmon — are heavy players in Republican political circles.
(In other environmentalism/religion news, a very nice lady from the <a href="http://www.nrpe.org/">The National Religious Partnership for the Environment</a> contacted me to let me know that they’ll be starting a blog soon. I’ll keep my eyes open, as should you. Update [2006-2-3 11:51:51 by David Roberts]: Oops, I was wrong about this. They’re not starting a blog — it’s their website itself that’s new. Anyway, worth checking out.)
<blockquote> A Letter to the National Association of Evangelicals on the Issue of Global Warming 
 We have appreciated the bold stance that the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) has taken on controversial issues like embracing a culture of life, protecting traditional marriage and family, promoting abstinence as AIDS prevention, and many others. 
 We respectfully request, however, that the NAE not adopt any official position on the issue of global climate change. Global warming is not a consensus issue, and our love for the Creator and respect for His creation does not require us to take a position. 
 We are evangelicals and we care about God’s creation. However, we believe there should be room for Bible-believing evangelicals to disagree about the cause, severity and solutions to the global warming issue. 
 Further, we signatories who are members of the NAE believe that if the NAE wishes to take an official position on global warming or any other issue, it should do so through its formal process within the general council. Individual NAE members or staff should not give the impression that they are speaking on behalf of the entire membership, so as not to usurp the credibility and good reputation of the NAE. 
 Evangelicals are to be first and foremost messengers of the good news of the gospel to a lost and dying world. We are to promote those things that please God and oppose those things in the world that clearly violate His righteous standard of conduct. We respectfully ask that the NAE carefully consider all policy issues in which it might engage in the light of promoting unity among the Christian community and glory to God. 
 With love and respect, 
 (Affiliations are provided for identification purposes only. Signatories are representing their own views, and not necessarily those of their churches or organizations.) 
 Charles W. Colson, Founder and Chairman Prison Fellowship Ministries 
 Dr. James C. Dobson, Founder and Chairman Focus on the Family
 Dr. John C. Hagee, Founder and Senior Pastor Cornerstone Church San Antonio, Texas 
 Rev. Dr. D. James Kennedy, Senior Minister Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 
 Dr. Richard Land, President The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission Southern Baptist Convention 
 Dr. Richard Roberts, President Oral Roberts University 
 Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, Chairman Traditional Values Coalition 
 Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman American Family Association 
 David Barton, Founder and President Wallbuilders 
 Joel Belz, Founder World Magazine 
 Dr. Richard B. Belzer Faith Evangelical Presbyterian Church 
 Dr. E. Calvin Beisner, Associate Professor Knox Theological Seminary 
 Rev. Jack Bradley Emmanuel Orthodox Presbyterian Church Colville, Washington 
 Dr. Kenneth Chilton Chapel of the Lake Lake Saint Louis, MO 
 Thomas Chilton Associate Director of International Training Awana Clubs International 
 Charles W. Jarvis, Chairman USA Next
 James Lafferty Christian Seniors Association 
 Tracy Miller Associate Professor of Economics Grove City College 
 Dr. Joey Pipa, President Greenville Theological Seminary 
 Dr. Timothy D. Terrell Associate Professor of Economics Wofford College 
 Rev. Ralph Weitz, Stewardship Pastor Immanuel Bible Church Springfield, VA 
 Alan Wisdom Interim President Institute on Religion and Democracy</blockquote>

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist</a> at <a href="https://new-grist-develop.go-vip.net/article/jesus-interruptus/">https://new-grist-develop.go-vip.net/article/jesus-interruptus/</a>.
 <link href="https://new-grist-develop.go-vip.net/article/jesus-interruptus/" rel="canonical"/>
 Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist.org</a>
 <script id="grist-syndication-pixel" async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TG2PKBX" data-source="repub" data-canonical="https://new-grist-develop.go-vip.net/article/jesus-interruptus/" data-title="Big political players in their midst derail possible climate-change statement" crossorigin="anonymous"/>

Our goal at Grist is to tell stories about climate solutions and a just future. That means we love when other outlets share our work. If you’re interested in republishing this story online or in print, we just have a few requirements:

Credit us.

For the byline, we prefer Author Name, Grist. At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.”

Check the image requirements.

Photos sourced from Getty Images in our pieces can be republished as long as you credit both Getty and Grist in the caption. Outside of this, you can’t republish photographs or illustrations without written permission from Grist and/or the photographer.

Don’t change anything significant.

You can change the headline and/or subheading, but articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s ok to change references to time (“yesterday” to “today”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). If you really think changing the story with additional localized copy would help, please contact us directly and we can discuss the change. We must approve the change before it goes live.

Don’t sell our stories.

We also ask that you don’t sell ads specifically meant to be placed in our stories. If you already have ads populating on your site, that’s completely fine.

Keep in contact.

Let us know if you republish our content! As a nonprofit news site, tracking the impact of our reporting and analysis is crucial. We’d love to hear more about how the work was useful to you and your outlet. And on the off chance that we ask you to remove the story from your site or apply a correction, please do so.

Use best practices for sharing.

If you do share the story on your social media accounts, we’d love it if you tagged Grist’s accounts:

Twitter: @Grist
Facebook: @Grist.org
Instagram: @Grist

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Republish this article | See instructions below: