If you haven’t been following the discussion under this post about Wal-Mart selling organic food, I recommend you catch up. It’s quite insightful, with a range of views well-expressed.

Grist State of Emergency | A limited-run newsletter from Grist, exploring the ways climate disasters are reshaping elections. Delivered every Tuesday until Election Day.

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free.

One note of consensus seems to be this: “Organic,” at least as denoted by the USDA label, falls well short of genuinely sustainable agriculture. Tom is better qualified than I to give a comprehensive description of the latter, but one important element is locality. Food that is grown, sold, and eaten within a single regional foodshed is closer to sustainable than organic mega-farms.

So, as a couple of people have suggested, perhaps one step in the right direction is a new label, to supplement “organic.” This raises two questions:

  1. What label? What wording should be used?
  2. What standards? Food-miles traveled? Animal health? Soil regeneration? Something else? Opine in comments.